Monday, April 13, 2009

Demystifying Naan Kadavul

Naan Kadavul, written and directed by Bala, will go down as one of the boldest films made in the Tamil cine industry. It is based on the novel, 'Ezham Ulagam' (Seventh World), written by Tamil writer Jeyamohan. Naan Kadavul is an honest attempt at showcasing 'ezham ulagam' - the 'Dark World' of beggars and aghori sadhus *as is* - a movie in its true ART form - a movie sans melodrama and fairy tales. I happened to watch the movie recently and like most people I felt a sense of incompleteness, which can be attributed to the lack of complete understanding of the film's true intentions. Hence, I set out to explore the rather unknown terrain of Bala's seventh world. Luckily, I stumbled upon on an excellent 'Naan Kadavul for Dummies' type write-up from Jeyamohan, who had apparently directed the article at the half-baked questions raised by pseudo-intellectual critics. It helped me understand a lot of otherwise-unknown (to me) aspects of the movie. The intention of this post is to provide an insight into Naan Kadavul and is part of my journey to understand the film better.



Naan Kadavul is a guided tour of the largely unknown world of aghori sadhus and beggars. From a bird's eye view, the two tales would appear largely disjoint and one might get an impression that there is not much in common between the two groups. But, there is actually a strong connection between beggars and aghori sadhus - only that Bala has played it subtle. Both aghoris and beggars belong to the same fictional seventh world. In a way, aghoris are beggars too, only that they chose their destiny. Bala has scripted a few scenes to convey this - the scene where a police constable mistakes Rudran for a beggar when he gets cocaine crazy. There are also sequences where the 'poli-samiyargal' talk about Rudran in the same breadth as beggars. While beggars are depicted as slave workers, Aghoris consider themselves to be super natural - next only to 'Kal Bhairav'. Naan Kadavul is a tale of two extreme groups belonging to the same dark world. It serves as a meeting point of the contrasting lives of Rudran and Hamsavalli.

Naan Kadavul believes that there is No God in the Seventh World. Bala has emphazized this belief throughout the tour in the form of various scenes and dialogues with a tinge of dark humour. A lot of the explicit content has been censored. Jesus and Buddha were supposed to be present as spectators in the scenes where the beggars get beaten up by Rudran & Co. The Gods of the world were supposed to be present when Hamsavalli begs Rudran for death. The objective was to take a dig at ALL religions. However, the censor board had other thoughts. To stress the point further, the physically disabled beggars were in the costumes of Lord Sivan, Parvathi and Murugan. This is a subtle way of saying that the gods of the world that we are in, are nothing more than handicapped helpless people in the seventh world. This is brilliant character sketching and symbolism from Bala. The beggars who never go inside the temple, however, consider the 'Mangandi Saami', who is a beggar himself, as their God. Another way of saying that if there is any God in the seventh world, he has to be a beggar too. The character of Hamasavali is sketched in a way to convey that in the dark world, even the people who initially believe in god would eventually be forced by their situation to give up their belief. She surrenders to a nun and gets converted to christianity but eventually Thandavan manages to *buy* her. This puts her in a miserable situation and she loses her faith in god and believes that only Rudran can relieve her from this world of misery. She conveys this to Rudran when she gets to meet him and her belief (or the lack of it) is conveyed to us by the dialogue where she accuses that no god cared for her miseries.

Naan Kadavul begins the tour from Kasi and all-about-aghoris is narrated by a sage to Rudran's father. The two main duties of aghoris - to punish the baddies and to give direct salvation to people whose lives are more miserable than death by killing them - are preached to Rudran by his guru. He asks Rudran to go along with hs father and also tells him to come back during the right time. An aghori can attain complete aghori-ness only after he renounces all his inner desires. Hence Bala has scripted the film in a way where Rudran begins to have some subtle feelings for Hamsavalli and goes on to show how Rudran denounces his feelings for her and attains aghori-ness. Rudran's emotions and feelings for Hamsavalli remain very subtle. He realises his feelings for her the first time he meets her in the cave and understands the actual reason for which his Guru has sent him down here. He understands that he needs to renounce his affection for her immediately and goes to the graveyard the same night, where we actually renounce her in a 'Kal -Bhairav' pose. During his stay at his hometown, Rudran accompishes the two main duties for aghoris as well by killing Thandavan (the skin cut in Rudran's forehead is symbolic of Sivaperuman) and by helping Hamsavalli attain direct salvation. Thus, Hamsavalli plays a great part in helping Rudran attain aghori-ness and goes to show the *strong connection* between the otherwise contrasting characters.
Naan Kadavul, for the most part, revolves around the life of beggars - the citizens of the seventh world. One may get a feeling that the film spends way too much time here. But, this is where the film remains honest to its intentions. The dark world is symbolically represented by the underground facility of Thandavan. The first few scenes in their story provide enough detail on their miseries and establishes the various characters. Once we get acquainted with them, we get to see their lighter side as well and enjoy the dark humour. There are a lot of small sub plots scripted as well. The objective behind the detail is to drive the message that the beggars, in spite of not having much control on their life, still manage to lead a happy life . In spite of their own miseries, they care for each other's sufferings and live like a happy family. And Bala wanted to clear the general misconception that the beggars have a soft corner for people who give alms to them. Beyond a point, they are not concerned much about the money and as shown in various sequences, they derive their humor by mocking at the people who visit the temple. The characters dressed like gods, mocking and laughing loud at the people visiting the temple is symbolic to Gods mocking at their superstitious beliefs.

Naan Kadavul is anything but judgmental. It doesn't preach atheism nor does it say that it is better to die than to lead a miserable life. It leaves the judgmental part to its audience. As a movie in its true ART form, Naan Kadavul chooses to show the lives of two contrasting groups of people * as is*, goes one step higher by establishing a strong connection between the groups symbolically and stops there - true to its intent.

16 comments:

  1. semma opening post machi.

    Though not as brilliant as brangan's analysis of the movie, ur post gives us great insight into the film

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Harish
    Thanks boss

    @Jeeth
    enne da eppa pathalum idhe dialogue sollitu thiriyare :)

    @Nishant
    thanks machi ..brangan pirichi menjitaru laa - enaku jeyamohan article padicha aprom dhan naraya matter purinjudhu :)...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Super da..Great analysis and pointed in detail

    Many films portray god represent GOD in the forms like Kaal Bhairav, Kaali, Aalaiyathamman etc. These forms were believed to be just a few in the thousands of other forms.
    The so called "SANTHASWAROOPI" form of GOD is totally forgotten in the process of film making.

    anyways...Even film makers have to make a living.

    This is cooool stuff da. But do come up with more analysis for some good films acted by our "ULAGANAYAGAN". I will wait for that too..

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Gokul

    Thanks machi.

    Agreed - there are many films based on supernatural powers. Most of 'em are cliched - the usual good vs evil. Though Bala gets his bread and butter from cinema, he never included any such elements in Naan Kadavul. And to appreciate NK, I don't have to agree with its content.

    I owe at least a post to Kamal. Let see if I stumble on something refreshing topic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't talk about the supernatural powers or the usage of graphics like laser lights flying with the rainbow colors.
    I emphasize the fact that the evil need not be destroyed by the GOOD factor. My point is if Bala is a such a natural director, he also cannot deny that the evil can reach its end through any other way too (Aandavan can die of AIDS or he can meet with a accident and can die very cruelly etc...)

    AND that in my point is more natural than wat is shown on the screen.

    Dont tell that the scope of Arya would get limited in that case. There were more other places in the movie where Arya's acting went untapped and he could have been used well for the efforts that he had taken for the past 3 yrs.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Gokul
    You are suggesting once possible demise for Thandavan. Bala chose to have Rudran do it. I don't see anything artificial in it. There is nothing wrong in it. It is pretty natural for an aghori like Rudran, given the context, to kill Thandavan.

    Its not about Arya's scope. Its about what an aghori would do in the given situation. And the intention of the movie is not to tap Arya's talent. Bala could have well have had more Arya gimmicks to add to the commercial value - That's the easier route to commercial success - I am happy that he didn't

    ReplyDelete
  7. am reading this for the 10th time now..nalla objective analysis da..:) i want to write abt. Memento actually...:) screenplay wise..."pinni pedal edutha" padam..haha.. am reading the script now and the short story by Jonathan Nolan..:) once i get i clear-cut understanding i will attempt writing about it..:) you can also try ..letz see who writes better ..:)

    ReplyDelete
  8. @shiva
    thanks da....

    nee kudutha memento pdf pathen ... naan padame ekkachaka time pathachu ....andha padatha laan pathi ezhudha enaku talent kidaydhu...venumna how to not make a memento nu gajini pathi venumna eshudhuven :D

    ReplyDelete
  9. Deeply thought and analyzed....liked it....

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tharu Maaru review or details...

    ////An aghori can attain complete aghori-ness only after he renounces all his inner desires. Hence Bala has scripted the film in a way where Rudran begins to have some subtle feelings for Hamsavalli and goes on to show how Rudran denounces his feelings for her and attains aghori-ness.////


    I read this in writer Jeyamohan's site.

    Wonderful dude. You did a good job. Reviews are as important as movies in devloping ur cine industry

    Regards,
    Giridharan

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks Giri - Jeyamohan had actually put in a lot of time for clearing a lot of non trivial stuff. Bala has weaved his magic throughout the movie and there can never be a more joyful experience than watching it with awe!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Please Reply to this:

    Where can I find the english translation of Ezham Ulagam? I really want to read it but I can't read tamil properly!!

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  13. he has no clue what he is talking about. purely an idea . . .nothing more .. . .

    ReplyDelete